John Kerry: Our Nation is a ‘Dangerous Place’ Thanks to Trump

Former Secretary of State under Barack Obama, John Kerry, asserted that America under President Trump’s policies has become “a very dangerous place

Kerry made that assessment in an appearance on ‘Hardball‘ on MSNBC.

The man who helped implement the failed nuclear deal with Iran first claimed the President almost “bumble(d)” his way into a war with the rogue nation.

Kerry proceeded to go off on other topics …

Do you support President Trump’s handling of Iran?

“He has obviously not achieved anything with North Korea,” he claimed. “He pulled us out of the Paris agreement.”

Kerry then fretted, “Americans are already dying from [climate change] … So we’re in a very dangerous place.”

AOC would be proud of such unhinged rantings.

Kerry is Scary

Kerry reiterated his determination that the world is less safe under President Trump, mocking him as a petulant child for an incident that took place at the NATO summit in London last month.

“What is worse, our president, the president of the United States of America, the leader of the of free world goes to a meeting of NATO in England and the leaders of the rest of the world are laughing at him,” Kerry suggested.

“So much so that he picks up his marbles like a kid in a schoolyard and goes home and then starts to just tweet in solitude.”

“We are in a dangerous place, and I think people know it,” he added.

Mitt Romney’s Approval Ratings Plunge After Siding With Dems On Impeachment

The folks back home in Utah may be having buyer’s remorse over electing Mitt Romney to the U.S. Senate where he quickly showed that his loyalties are with the other party. 

The failed GOP presidential candidate and leader of the Never Trump cabal has made it clear that he intends to side with Democrats during the trial phase of the impeachment sham and will do everything in his power to undermine President Trump.

Rudy Giuliani Makes Huge Disclosure: Indictments For Obama Officials Coming Soon

Pirro, cited Barr’s recent interview with CBS’s Jan Crawford where he said that as a legal matter, he didn’t believe he’d seen evidence of treason.

CrawfordYou’re working with the DNI, the head of CIA. I want to ask you about something- just declassification. But the president has tweeted and said publicly that some in the upper echelon, Comey, McCabe, etc., committed treason. I mean do you agree with that?

BarrWell, I- as a lawyer I always interpret the word treason not colloquially but legally. And you know the very specific criteria for treason- so I don’t think it’s actually implicated in the situation that we have now. But I think what he–



CrawfordYou don’t think that they’ve committed treason?

BarrNot as a legal matter, no.

This is the way prosecutors are supposed to proceed with their investigations.  Always moving forward with the presumption of innocence.

Responsible prosecutors don’t smear the target of their investigation when they can’t make the case against them.  They don’t create new legal standards like the one Special Counsel Robert Mueller relied on to smear President Trump last week:

As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.

So much for the presumption of innocence and the right of secret grand jury testimony.

Mueller swore to uphold the Constitution and the laws that have been  derived from it. He didn’t. What’s that make him guilty of?

If the justification for Mueller’s 22-month long witch-hunt is based on the importance of the presidency then the wrongful effort to destroy that president should be considered just as egregious.

Pirro asked President Trump’s attorney why Barr was so quick to dismiss the possibility that treason had been committed.

GiulianiThe reality is you don’t want to over promise.  You don’t want to overstate what’s there. You don’t want to make the same mistake they made in presuming President Trump to be guilty of collusion…

… Attorney General Barr is very upset by what they did and, even if it isn’t treason, it’s perjury, suborning perjury, submitting false documents to the FISA court, colluding with Ukrainians to obtain dirty information on Trump, the Trump campaign.

Fed Up Student Refuses To Remove Her Cap Unless Muslim Women Remove Their Headscarves

A STUDENT asked not to wear her cap in Bromley College says she won’t agree unless Muslim women remove their headdresses as well.

Caroline Powell, of Sevenoaks Way, Orpington, is attending Greenwich University, which uses facilities in Bromley College, Rookery Lane.
While inside the Bromley College buildings, the 39-year-old has been told repeatedly to remove her cap, but believes that, while Muslim women are allowed to wear headdresses, this represents “double standards”. The 39-year-old told News Shopper: “It started in September last year when I got stopped at the door by a woman and she said ‘you need to take your cap off’. “It is a small black leather cap but it’s part of my identity. She said ‘you need to take it off, they are the rules’. “A Muslim woman walked in behind me and I asked if she was going to ask her to take off her headdress. ..”

Hezbollah Threatens The USA: It’s Time For Iran’s Allies To Start Planning To Avenge Soleimani

Lebanon’s Hezbollah said on Sunday it was time for Iran’s allies to begin working to retaliate for the killing of Major General Qassem Soleimani though it would be a “long path” to the goal of ejecting U.S. forces from the region.

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah also denied the Iranian general had been planning to blow up U.S. embassies. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had been killed after he landed in Baghdad in part because “they were looking to blow up our embassy.”

Hezbollah, a heavily armed group designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, was established in 1982 by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and is an important part of a regional Tehran-led alliance known as “the axis of resistance.”

Iran responded for Soleimani’s killing by launching missiles at two military bases in Iraq that house U.S. forces on Wednesday. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei called it a “slap on the face” of the United States and said U.S. troops should leave the region.

Though the region remains tense, both sides have backed off from intensifying the conflict since the Iranian attack.

Nasrallah said last week that Iran’s allies, which include the Syrian government and numerous paramilitary groups set up with Iranian support in Iraq and Syria, should help exact revenge for Soleimani’s killing.

I believe it is time for the axis of resistance to start working,” he said in his speech on Sunday.

“The resistance forces are serious and aiming for the big goal that I proposed,” Nasrallah said, referring to the objective of seeing U.S. forces leave the region.

Retaliation would happen in the “coming days, weeks and months,” he said, adding “this is a long path.”

Explaining the decision to kill Soleimani, Trump said on Thursday “they were looking to blow up our embassy.”

He also said the United States carried out the strike because of a rocket attack on a U.S. military base in Iraq by an Iran-backed militia in December that killed a U.S. contractor, which U.S. officials believe Soleimani had a role in orchestrating.

Nasrallah said: “Trump is lying to his people … Haj Qassem Soleimani was not planning to blow up American embassies.”

The United States holds Hezbollah responsible for the suicide bombing that destroyed the U.S. Marine headquarters in Beirut in October 1983, killing 241 servicemen, and a suicide bombing the same year on the U.S. embassy.

Schiff Says The Threat Posed By Soleimani “Does Not Constitute ‘Imminent’”, Cruz Levels Him: “If You Didn’t Hate Trump”, It’d Be Easier To See

On Sunday morning, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) responded to House Intel Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), who recently insinuated that the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani was not justified after being briefed on the situation.

Following Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s interview on Thursday, Schiff casted doubt that there was an “imminent” threat posed by Soleimani.

In a statement posted on Twitter, Schiff quoted Pompeo, who said “we don’t know precisely when and we don’t know precisely where” a series of imminent attacks were being plotted by Soleimani.

“I’ve been a member of the Intel Committee for over a decade,” Schiff tweeted. “Been briefed hundreds of times on threats — some imminent, some not.”

“When targeting a top gov’t official for killing: We don’t know precisely when and we don’t know precisely where,” does not constitute ‘imminent,’” Schiff declared.

Senator Ted Cruz leveled Schiff after seeing his tweet and suggested that if the congressmam didn’t hate President Trump so much, he may be able to see just how big of a threat Soleimani was to American lives. 

“I was in the classified briefing too,” Cruz replied. “Credible intel that Soleimani was actively planning multiple deadly attacks against US serviceman & civilians in the Middle East in a matter of days…that’s pretty damn imminent.”

Schumer Lets Pelosi’s Reason For Stalling Slip Out – Chuck Thinks He Found New Impeachment Evidence, Calls For Witnesses

When Nancy Pelosi failed to send her partisan articles to the Senate, Washington scratched its head in confusion.

Why did she make such a big deal over impeachment, to stop at this crucial point? Does she want to hold this over President Trump’s head forever? Eventually, the Senate will convene and vote to throw out this charade.

Nancy knows her party is going to lose. She can’t pressure Mitch McConnell to do as she says. So what’s going on?

Seems like her counterpart in the Senate, Chuck Schumer is trying to bail her out.He just tried to pull a stunt to manipulate this process all over again.

From Fox News:

Sen. Chuck Schumer on Monday took up his push to have the Senate issue subpoenas that demand testimony from top Trump administration officials during the Senate impeachment trial after a new report claims to detail what occurred inside the administration during the decision to freeze aid to Ukraine. To the surprise of no one, Chuck Schumer is demanding witnesses in order to dig up more dirt on the president.

The House did a poor, rushed job of impeachment. None of their schemes were enough to convince Americans that Trump broke the law. Now, after their rushed, partisan vote, they are stuck. The Senate has every right to dismiss this case. So, Chucky thinks he can coerce the Senate into opening up a brand new investigation, to cover his party’s butt.

This is what happens when Democrats get a shred of power. They abuse it to remove the duly elected President of the United States. Not once have these Democrats tried to work with Trump. The moment they got the House, they pushed impeachment.

Tell your W.V. state legislators: Oppose an Article V Constitutional Convention

Your legislators in Charleston need to hear from you. Contact them today, and tell them to oppose SCR 4 and HCR 61, which would call for a dangerous constitutional convention.
West Virginia lawmakers are currently considering legislation — part of a national campaign to call a Constitutional Convention – that could put all of our constitutional rights and civil liberties at risk. The core founding document of our democracy could be amended, changed, or even totally rewritten, with no rules or safeguards to stop this process.
Make no mistake, all our rights as Americans would be on the line. The freedom of speech, the freedom of religion, gun ownership rights, and voting rights would be open to elimination or changes. This could change the character of our democracy for the worse.
There would be no rules governing this convention, leaving us unprotected from special interests and politicians. In this deeply divided time, we need to guard our civil rights.
Send a message to your state legislators today. Please click “Start Writing” to tell them to reject any call for an Article V convention.

(Note: You can view an explainer video here for more information about this issue.)


Columbus, Ohio | An 83-year old woman was arrested this morning and accused of training dozens of cats to steal jewelry and other valuables from her neighbors.

The Columbus Police Department opened an investigation on Ruth Gregson and her 65 cats in October after several neighbors reported small objects being stolen from their homes.

Several victims reported being visited by Ms. Gregson’s cats before noticing the disappearance of several shiny objects, like valuable cutlery and pieces of jewelry.

Despite their skepticism, investigators began a surveillance operation and were amazed by what they discovered.

According to Columbus Police Chief Kim Jacobs,  dozens of cats were constantly coming and going, bringing home “anything that shined”.

“She was like Fagin in Oliver Twist, but she was using cats as thieves instead of children. In less than three hours of surveillance, the detectives saw the cats bring home more than a hundred objects.”

Upon searching Ms. Gregson’s house, investigators found $650,000 worth of jewelry and precious metal among piles of worthless shiny baubles.

A total of 65 adult cats and 17 kittens were found on the site and entrusted to the Columbus Humane Society.

Chief Jacobs says the elderly woman confessed to training her cats to steal, saying the felines had to “earn their meals”.

“She would only feed the animals if they brought home valuables, so the animals had to steal every day in order to survive. Most were voluntarily malnurished so they would easily gain the neighbors’ pity and be allowed inside their houses.”  

According to the Columbus Police, Ms. Gregson’s animals could have stolen from more than 5,000 houses and apartment in the area, and investigators invite possible victims to contact them.

While Ms. Gregson is the first person in American history to be accused of training cats to steal, this isn’t the first time that animals are trained to commit crimes.

In 2009, a surveillance that caught a monkey stealing hundreds of dollars worth of plants from a Texas nursery.

At the time, the police and store owners had hypothesized that the monkey had been trained to take the plants and hand them over a fence to a waiting human accomplice.

In 2013, a Chicago court sentenced a man to five years in prison for training ferrets to steal cell phones from people on the street and on public buses.


Cincinnati, Ohio | A 31-year old woman was admitted to the University of Cincinnati Medical Center yesterday after the 14-month old toddler she was babysitting got stuck in her vaginal cavity.

Latifah Brown called 911 around 9:30 PM last night, reporting that she had a baby stuck in her vagina.

The operator first assumed that she was giving birth at home and dispatched an ambulance to the site.

The paramedics had quite a surprise when they arrived on the site and saw what was actually happening.

One of the paramedics, Brian Whitmore, related the incident in an interview with WBNS-10 TV.

“The little boy wore a diaper and pyjamas, but he had his legs and abdomen stuck in the woman’s vagina.”

The paramedics spent more than an hour on the site trying to release the child from his difficult position but were unable to get the toddler out.

“I don’t know how she got the child in there! We were both pulling as strong as we could and he wouldn’t come out.”

Ms. Brown and the child were finally transported to the hospital, where doctors were able to separate them after a delicate operation.

The young boy suffers from a dislocated hip, but doctors don’t think he will suffer any sequelae from the incident.